Scene 1: The Grand Courtroom
[Setting: A massive, gilded courtroom, the air heavy with an intimidating silence. Conundrum, God of Conundrums, stands at the defendant’s podium, looking sharp but exasperated. Across from him sits a hooded figure, the plaintiff, their face obscured. The Judge—a towering, robed figure whose presence seems to command the laws of physics—bangs their gavel with a thunderous echo.]
Judge: “We will now hear the case of… (checks notes) the plaintiff against the God of Conundrums, for—”
The Judge pauses, squinting.
Judge: “…violation of… Section 42, Subsection E, Paragraph… oh dear, even I can’t read this. Bailiff, hand me the magnifying glass.”
[Conundrum leans on his podium, smirking.]
Conundrum: “Your Honor, I believe we’re already proving my case. Shall we adjourn on grounds of inherent absurdity?”
[The Judge fixes him with a glare. The hooded plaintiff chuckles softly, the sound oddly melodic.]
Plaintiff: “Nice try, Conundrum. But even you can’t wiggle out of this one.”
Scene 2: The Argument Begins
[Conundrum strides to the center of the courtroom, a scroll in hand. Its length unfurls dramatically, rolling across the floor and out the courtroom doors. T.Pratchett, a smug goat sitting beside the plaintiff, begins to munch on the corner of the parchment.]
Conundrum (gesturing broadly): “This so-called ‘law’ reads like the fever dream of a drunk scribe who mistook his inkpot for his wine goblet! ‘Thou shalt not conspire to obfuscate, unless thou dost obfuscate whilst conspiring’—does anyone here even know what that means?”
The courtroom murmurs. The plaintiff leans back, their demeanor amused.
Plaintiff: “It means what it implies, dear Conundrum. Perhaps if you hadn’t implied yourself into so many loopholes, you wouldn’t be standing here today.”
[Conundrum glares at the plaintiff.]
Conundrum: “Oh, I see what’s happening. You’re not here for justice—you’re here for theater. And goats.”
Judge (banging the gavel): “Order! We will have no slandering of goats in my court!”
Reading on this site? This novel is published elsewhere. Support the author by seeking out the original.
T.Pratchett bleats in agreement, chewing the scroll with renewed vigor.
Scene 3: The Long Sprawling Narrative
[Conundrum paces the courtroom, launching into one of his infamous sprawling narratives, his voice rising with rhetorical flair.]
Conundrum: “Ladies and gentlemen, gods and mortals, allow me to tell you a tale. Picture, if you will, a farmer, standing at the edge of his field. He has a single goat, a single fence, and a single goal: to keep the goat inside. The farmer writes a rule: ‘The goat shall not leave the field.’ Simple, right?”
He pauses, spinning to face the plaintiff.
Conundrum: “But what does it mean? If the goat merely pokes its head through the fence, has it ‘left’? If it digs a hole beneath, does it violate the spirit of the law or just the letter? And what of the farmer, who leaves the gate open? Is he complicit in the goat’s escape—or is the goat a victim of poorly implied boundaries?”
[The courtroom leans in, enraptured. The plaintiff finally lowers their hood, revealing the elegant visage of Imri, Goddess of Implications. Her eyes sparkle with mischief as she slowly claps.]
Imri: “Bravo, Conundrum. But you’ve forgotten the most important question: What if the goat never intended to leave but simply implied that it might? Wouldn’t that be the truest violation of the law?”
Gasps ripple through the courtroom. Conundrum falters, momentarily stunned.
Conundrum: “You… you’re the plaintiff?! You orchestrated this whole charade just to—”
Imri (smiling coyly): “To show you the beauty of your own chaos. And, of course, to remind everyone here that laws are nothing but carefully curated implications. Without me, your conundrums would be aimless.”
Scene 4: Chaos Unleashed
T.Pratchett lets out an ear-piercing bleat, leaping onto the judge’s bench. In the confusion, scrolls scatter, legal documents flutter through the air, and the courtroom devolves into comedic chaos. Imri stands serenely amidst it all, lighting a cigarette that produces visible, unscented smoke.
Imri (to Conundrum): “You see, darling, you and I are two sides of the same coin. Without implications, your puzzles lack depth. Without your conundrums, my implications lack intrigue. Isn’t it fun when the lines blur?”
Conundrum sighs, pinching the bridge of his nose.
Conundrum: “You’ve made your point. Next time, just send a memo.”
Imri: “Where’s the fun in that?”
Scene 5: The Verdict
[The Judge regains control, slamming their gavel.]
Judge: “This court finds… both parties equally ridiculous. Case dismissed!”
Imri winks at Conundrum, then saunters out with T.Pratchett in tow. Conundrum watches her go, muttering under his breath.
Conundrum: “Never trust a goat. Or a goddess.”
Scene 6: Aftermath
As the courtroom settles into silence, a piece of the tattered scroll flutters to the ground near the Bailiff’s feet. He picks it up, squinting at the faint text.
Bailiff (murmuring): “Every law is an invitation to chaos…” He glances around, as if the words have triggered some profound realization, then tucks the scroll fragment into his pocket.
Across the room, Conundrum stands by the doorway, watching Imri leave with T.Pratchett in tow.
Conundrum (grumbling): “She’s impossible. But damn it, she’s right.”
He glances at the Judge, who is glaring at the scattered papers.
Judge (dryly): “And they wonder why I drink.”
The Judge slams the gavel one final time, and the scene fades as the echoes ripple outward.
[End Scene]
[retcon:1]