At Port Dos, I stood on the airfield, my eyes scanning the impressive lineup of aircraft prototypes. Eleven models, each with a distinct color, are arranged for the trials. From Mark 1 to Mark 11, the vibrant hues made it easy to track each plane in the air.
I adjusted the control mask on my face as I began the aircraft trials, I felt a mix of excitement and nervous anticipation.
The takeoff is smooth for all models. Each aircraft, ranging from the simplest Mark 1 to the extravagant Mark 11, all climbed into the sky. They formed up in V formation, a striking display of colors in the sky like Von Richtofen Flying Circus.
It quickly became apparent that there are clear differences between them. Mark 4, the most budget-friendly model, is lagging behind. Its performance is noticeably slower compared to the others. On the other hand, the Mark 8, my most costly and high-end model, surged ahead with impressive speed. The rest of the models fell somewhere in between these two extremes.
The lightweight materials and superior engineering of the Mark 8 are paying off. Its swift, graceful maneuvers and rapid acceleration made it stand out. I watched with a growing sense of satisfaction as the Mark 8 maintained its lead throughout the test.
The other aircraft also showed their unique characteristics. Mark 2, initially trailing near the back, began catching up as the test progressed. By the end of the trials, Mark 2 had managed to secure the second-place position. The engine’s performance, even in a mid-tier model, seemed to be a standout feature.
I observed the results with a mix of admiration and curiosity. The performance variations between the models are fascinating, highlighting the impact of design choices, materials, and engineering. The Mark 8 is clearly a triumph in terms of speed and agility, but the surprising turnaround of the Mark 2 suggested that even less expensive models had their strengths.
Satisfied with the trials, I noted the results and the potential improvements. Each model had performed according to expectations, and the data collected would be invaluable for future adjustments and enhancements. With a final glance at the colorful lineup still circling the airfield, I felt a renewed sense of accomplishment. The prototypes had lived up to their promise, and now, it is time to consider the next steps in their development.
As the aircraft completed their initial maneuvers and landed gracefully on the airfield, I prepared for the next round of trials. The air is soon filled with the roar of engines as the second batch of each prototype, ten planes per model, took to the sky. The vibrant colors of the Mark models painted a dynamic mosaic against the clear blue.
With the aircraft in the air, I focused on the second part of the trials: evaluating the turning circles. This metric is crucial for assessing agility and handling in combat scenarios. I adjusted the control mask, eager to see how each model would perform in this new test.
The results quickly revealed themselves. Mark 6, unexpectedly, took first place with an impressive 20-second turning circle for a heavy fighter. Its maneuverability is exceptional, and it demonstrated agility that surpassed even my highest expectations. Hot on its heels are Mark 7 and Mark 9, showing commendable performance and nimbleness in their turns.
Mark 8, despite its top-tier speed performance, landed in third place for turning circles. This is a bit surprising given its advanced design, but it still showed respectable agility. Mark 4, the least expensive model, managed to secure a middle position in turning circles, which is intriguing given its lower cost and performance characteristics.
At the lower end of the scale, Mark 1 struggled with a turning circle of 29 seconds, which is less than ideal. It became clear that the turning performance varied significantly across the different models, reflecting the trade-offs between speed, agility, and design specifications.
Unauthorized duplication: this tale has been taken without consent. Report sightings.
To ensure the accuracy of my findings, I ran the turning circle test again. The results remained consistent, confirming the performance characteristics observed earlier. With the data solidified, I shifted focus to the climbing performance of the models.
The aircraft ascended once more, and the climb rate is soon evident. Mark 8, with its superior design and materials, demonstrated a remarkable climb rate, continuing its strong performance from earlier trials. In stark contrast, Mark 4 lagged behind with the lowest possible climb rate, reflecting its more budget-conscious engineering.
As the second batch of trials concluded, I reviewed the data with a sense of accomplishment. The results are clear and informative. Mark 6 had excelled in turning circles, Mark 8 remained a top performer in speed and climb rate, and the performance of each model is shaping up to guide future development decisions.
With the trials complete, I prepared to analyze the findings and consider the next steps. The prototypes had provided valuable insights, and I am eager to integrate these lessons into refining and optimizing the designs further.
---
The next phase of the trials began as the aircraft are equipped with 500kg guided glide bombs, each featuring its own model of radar guidance. The process is straightforward: each plane would demonstrate its precision with these advanced munitions.
With the aircraft loaded and the guidance systems in place, I watched with anticipation as the prototypes took to the skies once more. The Mark 11, fitted with the most expensive radar guidance system, is expected to perform well, and it didn’t disappoint. Its precision is nothing short of impressive, achieving a perfect 10/10 shot accuracy. This level of performance underscored the significant battlefield advantage that advanced radar guidance could provide.
As the afternoon sun cast long shadows across the airfield, the final test results came in. The data revealed a wealth of insights into each model's strengths and weaknesses. The guided bomb trials are a success, and I am pleased with the performance across the board.
With the trials complete, I turned my attention to the next phase of the design process. I began combining the best features from each model into a single, unified design. The goal is to integrate the superior turning circle of Mark 6, the speed of Mark 8, and the precision of Mark 11’s radar guidance into one aircraft.
As I reviewed the numbers and features, I noted that the most advanced prototype model is priced at 130,000 credits—a hefty sum, but one that I felt its justified. The combined features and performance capabilities of this aircraft promised to deliver unmatched effectiveness on the battlefield.
Incorporating all the insights from the trials into the final design, I felt a sense of satisfaction. The investment in developing a top-tier heavy fighter is proving to be worthwhile. The design is shaping up to be a formidable addition to my fleet, and I am excited about the possibilities it would bring.
With the new heavy fighter taking shape and the trials providing valuable data, I looked forward to the next steps in refining the aircraft and preparing it for final production.
The next morning, I decided to dive back into the design work, though I am feeling quite exhausted. Thankfully, the process is smoother than expected. Combining all the best features from my prototypes into a single, finalized aircraft felt almost effortless. I am thrilled with how the design is coming together.
The new aircraft is a marvel of engineering, with its form evolving into something resembling a sleek jet aircraft while retaining a silver finish reminiscent of the F-1 Eagle. The aerodynamic improvements are noticeable, and the overall look is more refined than any of the previous models. However, as I finalized the dimensions, I realized that the aircraft would not fit on my Long Island light aircraft carrier. Despite being foldable, it's still too large for both the hangar and the runway. it's a bit of a disappointment, but not a huge setback.
I decided that, for now, these aircraft would serve as land airbase fighters rather than carrier's base. They would remain land-based for the time being, which would still allow me to take advantage of their advanced features.
After I put the Mark 12 into production and getting some models, it's time to revisit the trials. After conducting a new round of tests. True to expectations, the Mark 12 surpassed each previous model in its respective categories. Its performance is stellar, and while each unit came with a hefty price tag of 140,000 credits, the investment felt worthwhile given the capabilities of the aircraft.
The trials confirmed what I had hoped: the Mark 12 is a game-changer. With its advanced features and improved design, it's clear that this aircraft would be a valuable asset to my fleet. Despite the higher cost, I am confident that the benefits would far outweigh the expense. The future is looking promising, and I am eager to see how this new addition would perform in real-world scenarios.
And so, i finalized it and gave it the name F-2 Tomcat Heavy Multirole Fighter.