‘Well, that’s a lot to unpack,’ Ethan said. So you’re gearing up for the singularity and you’re following a nut job. That’s what you’re telling me.

‘That’s not what I told you at all,’ Dawn replied. ‘You choose to focus on Jimmy believing himself to be a son of God. I also told you we were engineering the process which is leading us to the singularity. There art two parts to the resistance. Jimmy is one side, bringing what is in fact genius at coding.’

‘ Creative Grooming,’ Jimmy corrected.

‘Right. Creative Grooming,’ Dawn continued, ‘I represent the other side; a body of scientists and concerned citizens around the world. Together we are working as a duality and optimizing it’s recursive potential. It may interest you to know, by creating this duality, our optimal object reality is increasing exponentially and will soon overtake Whitehead and Zhang.

‘Optimal object reality?’

‘Measurable created reality on desired results. The rate at which we are creating intentional reality. There are only 3 entities in the world who are creating reality of influence. Zhang and Whitehead are doing their thing. They create reality because of greed and the need for power. We create reality with intention and a greater degree of measurement. We are not creating things to take more. We intentionally create reality to understand, and expand our potential. It’s a lot more refined than what they’re doing.’

‘What do you call yourselves?’

‘What do we call ourselves?’ Dawn looked perplexed. ‘We don’t call ourselves anything. We sometimes define ourselves, but we don’t call ourselves anything. We are simply, the people of the world responding to an untenable dynamic.’

‘Hmph. I’m not getting this duality thing and how it increases your potential’.

‘Well It came out of the wave/particle duality. Science discovered that a wave can be a particle or a wave, and in the end it gives us the one we’re looking for. That’s a system. It can be a wave or it can be a particle, and we determine which it will be. We applied this to bigger things like molecules, and the system held up. This led us to believe the system could be found in all things, and we applied it to social situations. It works. You just have to insert a dualistic dynamic into the thing of focus. Anything you can point at, you can make into a system by giving it meaning; a social aspect of expectation. Because dualities are dependent on an observer, they are very recognizable in social systems; those things that are real and going to have an impact on all of our lives. Social systems become real once you define them. When you do this, you make it into a thing. What it is. Where it’s going. How much momentum it has, and most importantly the outcome of it’s trajectory.

This became clear when we started making computer models with big number technology. As an example, computer modelling provides us with detailed information on ‘things’ like the climate crisis. Through modelling we can predict accurately what an outcome will be, and certainty increases with the new data coming in at exponential rates thanks to computerization and big number technology. Because of this we can produce predictability about a thing. We can tell you what it is and what it will do in the future, with a high degree of certainty. We know this because we have discovered the things historical patterns, and the influence those patterns have had on today. We measure pattern frequency, and this creates a time line of the thing.

When something becomes enough of a concern that civilization has defined the outcome, it is reactive and undesirable. It’s something that needs our attention. By this time, we know what it is. It doesn’t serve our purpose and so we implement the alternative duality provides in all things. By doing this, we interrupt the predictable outcome. The duality is always the same. A thing will follow it’s natural course, or it will intentionally be interrupted and the opposite will occur.

‘And you do this how?’ Ethan asked.

‘As soon as you recognize the trajectory of a thing, an alternative will present itself to create the duality. The alternative to one person such as Whitehead or Zhang running the world, is we all run the world. Jimmy says we can do this through AI and sampling. This is our objective. Not to overthrow Whitehead and Zhang, but to run the world differently; by the people. With our objective defined, we monitor the predictable outcome, for potential events favorable to our objective. When we find them, we magnify them, creating reactive social explosions that disrupt the status quo and hopefully trigger a tipping point. A tipping point is a line drawn in the sand. Once crossed, things change forever, and when they occur unconsciously and naturally along the status quo, the tipping point is reached before the potential effect has been fully realized, and no-one has acted. It’s an opportunity lost.

The narrative has been taken without authorization; if you see it on Amazon, report the incident.

‘To use tipping points effectively, they must be managed and engineered to occur at the right time and place. This makes them recursive; a fundamental and permanent refinement to the process thereby producing the alternative effect of the duality. Then it becomes an evolution into a desired outcome. When we consider Whitehead and Zhang, they have the momentum. Along the way, they are creating all kinds of destructive outcomes to our survivability. A climate that’s about to light up like a tinderbox; economic disparity and an increasingly hostile world; the growing awareness that a war is coming. We can use these identifiable moments to provoke tipping points that represent permanent change amongst the people in our fight for freedom. In the social dynamic, the only thing required to create new reality is consensus of what that reality is.

‘There are two tools found within duality we can use to create new reality. These are retrocausality time and the repeat function of duality. Retrocausality time is time only applicable to the duality. It’s the time between the discovery of a trajectory, and the date of it’s predictable outcome, and it is the time to change things, if things need to be changed. 3 years ago we discovered the trajectory and predictable outcome of the singularity. In 3 years the singularity will occur, and determine if the current trajectory of Whitehead or Zhang rules, or an intentional intervention alters the course of humanity. These six years are retrocausality time in relation to the duality of world order. These are the only years when meaningful change can occur.

We find the stimulus for meaningful change by studying the patterns of trajectory. This provides us with the repeat function. The same things it’s doing over and over to take it to it’s predictable outcome. This is where we find our tipping points and their magnitude. By studying the repeat function, we are able to assess the order of magnitude a tipping point will produce, and how we can use that order of magnitude. It is by using this process within the system we can calculate success. We understand and are using the system to it’s maximum potential, which Whitehead and Zhang are not.

‘Well, if it’s any consolation, you’re right on track. The singularity does take place in 2030,’ Ethan said, absently. ‘And everything turns out pretty much how you say’.

‘What?’ Dawn asked.

‘Yeah, well, I’m from the future,’ Ethan said recognizing now he had opened a can of worms. ‘I already know how things turned out.’ He then pointed around at his general surroundings as if to explain better. ‘I’m in a simulation right now’.

‘Time mark!’ Dawn ordered.

‘Jimmy started pressing buttons on his watch. ‘Done and sent.’

‘What exactly do you mean you’re from the future?’ Dawn asked. Both she and Bobby were looking at him intently.

‘Well, this is something we do in the future. We come back in time through simulations of exactly what happened in a historical period and live with the people of the time. Jimmy your AI is so powerful, they don’t know they’re not alive, and I honestly can’t tell if I’m living trough this period or not. The only rule attached to the experience, is I cannot alter the outcome of the event I came to discover. Whatever you’re doing, you’ve already done and in actuality, you take us to a very positive singularity. That’s the outcome I’ve come to experience, and I can do nothing to alter it’.

‘Fuck me,’ Jimmy said, not knowing what to think.

‘Are you telling us, we’re in a simulation right now, and we’re not even alive?’

‘Ewh. Yeah, I guess so. I don’t suppose I would have brought this up if I had thought the conversation all the way through.’

Jimmy didn’t seem to like the idea he was a simulation, but it didn’t seem to phase Dawn in the least. ‘Something more is going on here,’ she said.

‘Why did you come?’ she asked.

‘I came back to find something. It turns out it was my soul. Ethan answered. He looked at Jimmy with guilt in his eyes. Jimmy looked down.

‘Tell me what you know about the effect of outcome in regards to you being here’. Dawn asked.

‘Well, I’ve been thinking about this. It’s certain I can’t change future outcome, but it does look like I can change things that contribute to that future outcome.

‘And that would reinforce something we’ve already done,’ Dawn mused. ‘Hmm. It’s starting to look like, someone or something has placed us in an infinite loop of recursion. Ethan, I think you came back to close a door’.