In the beginning there was nothing, but what is nothingness? A boundless empty void? The lack there of, of the existence of  anything and everything? Is it even possible to define nothing, or does something need to exist in order for there to be the nothing? However, if something is not in existence, and all there is, is the nothingness, does that mean that nothing in it of itself is something? If nothing is something, and then the nothingness in it of itself is something, an empty something containing nothing... which is also something? What is this paradoxical nothingness? A Nothingness containing nothing, something containing something, something containing nothing, or could a nothingness contain something?

You might be reading a pirated copy. Look for the official release to support the author.

Now there was something, a something in addition to the nothing, an idea. An idea stemming from the nothingness that is something, and creating something which is not nothing. That  idea being a paradox contrived from the original paradox of nothingness. And what is an idea but a byproduct of consciousness. Thus began the universe, a paradoxical consciousness existing in nothing and being born from another paradox, in which nothing questioned its own nothingness.