*Forensic Psychological Profiling Report*
*Forensic Psychologist: * Dr. Theodore Lazaridis
Assumed profile of a suspect in case #3989-A3
To structure the following profile based on what little evidence we have, I will first start by listing the different facts we can extrapolate based on different factors, which I will elaborate upon in the second half of the report.
*Subject Demographics*
- Age range: Late 20s to early 40s (based on likeliness of medical degree, and required assets)
- Gender: Male (assuming a single individual)
- Occupation/Socioeconomic status: Likely middle to upper class
----------------------------------------
*Motivational Factors*
- Potential motives: Revenge, experimentation, religious beliefs, or a fascination with torture, evidence provided could indicate vigilantism
----------------------------------------
*Psychological Traits*
-Unclear. Meticulous nature of the committed crime could indicate narcissistic and/or obsessive tendencies
----------------------------------------
*Behavior and Patterns*
- Possible routine or ritual surrounding the crimes
- Potential for escalating violence or sadism over time
Stolen from its rightful author, this tale is not meant to be on Amazon; report any sightings.
- Methods of disposal or hiding evidence after each mutilation
- Possible self-justification for committed acts
----------------------------------------
*Intelligence and Skill*
- High level of anatomical knowledge and surgical precision. Possible medical degree
- Ability to obtain or create necessary equipment and chemicals
- Potential use of disguises or pseudonyms to remain undetected
----------------------------------------
*Elaboration*
1. The age range of the individual we are looking for is likely to be a lot wider than assumed right now., assuming our subject was 18 when he started to pursue his medical degree, we are looking at a person approximately 32 years of age, at minimum. I’m still contemplating alternative ways our unknown suspect could have acquired his knowledge. (Blackmarket doctor? Combat surgeon?)
----------------------------------------
2. The evidence found could indicate a personal relationship between the victim and the assailant, and the addition of the text written on the wall strongly suggests a certain degree of self-righteousness, or justification for the victims’ mutilation, aided by the possibly incriminating evidence found on the hard-drive contained in a deliberately placed metal container. A possible vendetta? Possible. The provided files possibly incriminate the victim itself, a pointed finger of sorts telling us: “This man is bad, and here is the proof”
Until we have a more detailed idea of who we are dealing with, any assumptions made about the nature of the relationship between the victim and the assailant are extremely difficult to verify.
----------------------------------------
3. I am crossing out the likeliness that the crime committed was done out of twisted fascination, sexual gratification, or religious belief.
Nothing so far has indicated ritualistic, or sexually stimulating reasons for the crime. No symbols or carvings were found on site, and neither were any bodily fluids of foreign origin.
----------------------------------------
4. With the degree of violence we are faced with, it seems fairly obvious that we’re dealing with a case of psychopathy, combined with the very peculiar nature of the mutilations and the planning that must have gone into staying hidden, preparing, and transporting the victim, assuring it’s survival…
Do I believe that we’re dealing with a sadist? Maybe. The vision of the man we are looking for I have before me might be obsessive, prideful in his skillset with delusions of grandeur in what he is doing.
Should this person have any of my assumed traits, then I’m afraid that our Mr. Wilson might not be the last victim.